Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Considering Election/Voting Fraud

All this debate over voting identification, yet it's only the tip of the iceberg regarding "election/voting fraud".

To being with, the voting system itself — the plurality voting system — perpetuates a duopoly partisan system by introducing the spoiler effect, candidate cloning, and the wasted vote syndrome (see RangeVoting.org to learn more).

Next, we have black box voting in various states, which is not only often in violation of State Constitutions, but has been shown to be unreliable at best and rigged at worst (check out HBO's "Hacking Democracy"  http://www.hackingdemocracy.com ).

Then there is the "debate" folly.  If anyone actually thinks the "debates" aren't controlled in a way to prevent non-duopoly candidates from being involved, while crafting the Q's & A's to make crooks and liars look good to the American voters… then perhaps you should not vote anyway!  8-)  (or perhaps you should watch "Who's Afraid of an Open Debate?"  https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1NXhoP5bQ2M#! )

And let's not forget about the media, who begins selecting "top tier" candidates in the Primary race nearly a year before the public does, thus leading ignorant voters.  In some cases "journalists/reporters" have blatantly stated to the public that certain candidates cannot win.  Some news networks have even altered or omitted data as election results were reported.

Regardless of all, people don't turn out for the most important election anyway — the Primaries — when there is a chance of beating the "establishment Republicrat" (you know, the duopoly candidate that the political party helps to win).  People only really turn out for the General election when they can ONLY vote for ONE authoritarian collectivist or the OTHER (evil VS evil).

Yet, the foolish debate over voting identification goes on.

Perhaps the masses deserve to continue playing the fool if their votes can be so blatantly manipulated in such a corrupted election system, when all they can focus on in this matter is voter identification.

More Fool We.


bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

Friday, July 26, 2013

Trayvon & Zimmerman Tragedy

My thoughts regarding the Trayvon & Zimmerman tragedy are perhaps best conveyed through an online dialog I had at Huffington Post:


My posted comment:

how is “dope smoking, racist gangsta wannabe" a racist statement, yet "white cracker" isn't?

the only thing Nugent is off base in criticizing here are people who smoke marijuana — apparently a major flaw in his understanding of liberty.

the people among the pathetic media who call themselves "journalists" are the ones that should be REMOVED from their positions for continually feeding into the political BS that is dividing this country.

and the sheeple who buy all the media BS should get a clue, but they don't. perhaps they believe it's "NORMAL" to use photos of the "victim" at 13 years of age in order to gain sympathy.

the Trayvon-Zimmerman matter has again proven that whenever it's convenient for the authoritarian collectivists to sidestep the heart of an issue, they will — this time under the guise of "racism", when that wasn't even a factor in the entire tragedy... a tragedy which could have been avoided if Trayvon had communicated to Zimmerman, rather than electing to set up an ambush.

violence begets violence. i just hope others learn from this incident that it's NEVER OK to attack someone, even if being followed.

i carry nearly all of the time. if someone ever attacks me, i won't hesitate to protect myself... PERIOD!

so keep sleeping if you want to Neo-Amerian Sheeple! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.... 8-)

One commenter replied:

Quote: "a tragedy which could have been avoided if Trayvon had communicated to Zimmerman, rather than electing to set up an ambush." 

Really? Despite no witness backing this up, you know this is what happened because why? Solely based on Zimmerman claim that this is what happened. How about, a tragedy which could have been avoided if Zimmerman had stayed in his car and obeyed the dispatcher who told him not to follow Martin? And as for violence begetting violence, what about Zimmerman’s past including, regular use of Racial Slurs, Domestic Abuse, and Resisting Arrest? He is an “Angel” though, right?

My response:

of course, i don't *know* exactly what happened.  and let's face facts, neither of these guys were "angels".  but i can only make conclusions based upon those few facts which were evidenced.

for example, based upon the initial phone conversation with the police, it appears to be fairly obvious to me that Zimmerman's intent was never to hurt anyone, otherwise he wouldn't have called the police to begin with.  he was apparently concerned about the recurring theft that was going on in the neighborhood, and perhaps the safety of his uncle, and wanted the police to get there ASAP.

… or he was acting the entire time, having the true intent of taking a life that night.

he also apparently didn't want a potential thief suspect to get away without being questioned by the police.  i would feel likewise, as there have been a string of scooters stolen in my neighborhood — two of which from my property — and we've had continued recent visits from "gangsta wannabe's" casing my property since.  thieves SHOULD BE afraid of being shot when trespassing.

personally, i would have shouted at such a suspect in order to ascertain his intent while on the phone with the police.  and yes, the entire tragedy might have been avoided.  but then again, do we know if the two men didn't have some such words that weren't recorded?  regardless, Zimmerman doesn't deserve to go to prison for lack of communication.

aside from Zimmerman's apparent intent, if Trayvon was simply on his way home, why didn't he get there in four minutes?  what was HIS intent once he realized a "creepy ass white cracker" was following him?  did he decide that he was upset enough for being followed that he chose some other course of action other than returning home?  what other course of action could that have been?  if Trayvon felt threatened at any point during that time, why didn't he leave?

these among other points cause me to conclude that Zimmerman was trying to keep tabs on where Trayvon was until the police got there.  Trayvon had ample time to leave the scene, yet elected an alternate course of action — to attack Zimmerman.

regardless, if there is not enough evidence to convict Zimmerman otherwise, innocence must be presumed.

but of course, most of what we're discussing is off topic to this article.

i just hope and pray that this tragedy saves lives in the future by giving cause for pause to those who would think about assaulting, thieving, or otherwise violate the natural rights of others.



Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Small Acts of Kindness and Love

While watching the Hobbit recently, this quote really seemed noteworthy regarding much of what i often struggle with.  Too bad I haven't applied heeding it more over the past couple of weeks, for I might not have allowed myself to become so struck with overwhelm, negativity and the feeling of self-uselessness:

"Gandalf: Saruman believes it is only great power that can hold evil in check, but that is not what I have found. I found it is the small everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay. Small acts of kindness and love."

We might be very surprised if we knew just how far our small acts of kindness and love go, while we continue to remain in our varying degrees of personal misery worrying about however we feel our 'large acts of greatness' might be falling short.


Tuesday, May 21, 2013

IRS Targeting VS Targeting the IRS

Regarding the "IRS Targeting" issue, I received an email today from a Michigan Congressman (below my signature).  I shared with him and our Liberty Asheville network my first thoughts that came to mind...

Dr. Dan Benishek asks, "Do you think the President knew about targeting of conservative groups by the IRS?"

Well, that's a largely irrelevant question, isn't it?

A more relevant question is, "Why is America still plagued with an 'income' tax system which violates the natural right of privacy?"

Or, "How can any individual be 'free' in such an authoritarian collectivist social-economic environment that prohibits privacy?"

The founders made it explicitly clear that there should be NO direct tax placed upon a free individual (US Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 4), yet American generations have allowed a limited government to grow more unlimited and simultaneously violate the law of the land and our natural rights in this area (along with many others) for about a century now.

If we entirely eliminated all direct taxes, no one in the gov't system could ever use taxation as a means to target any specific individual or group of individuals.

Oh, and we'd restore our unalienable natural individual right to privacy.

Seems like a no-brainer, eh?


bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

On May 20, 2013, at 2:33 PM, Dan Benishek <Updates@DanBenishek.com> wrote:

Friend --
I am writing to ask for a few minutes of your time to let me know what you think by filling out a short survey.
Hearing from you is an important part of representing Americans and my fellow Michiganders in the First District. I value this opportunity to learn your opinions, ideas and concerns.
Do you think the President knew about targeting of conservative groups by the IRS?

Please take a moment to share your thoughts by filing out this survey.
Thank you for your time and interest.  I appreciate hearing from you today and I look forward to hearing from you again in the future.  
Best wishes,

Dan Benishek
Re-Elect Dr Dan Benishek · United States
This email was sent to bbc@infinitygames.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.
You can also keep up with Dan Benishek on Twitter or Facebook.
Paid for by Benishek for Congress

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Anti-Gun Lunacy Teaches Students to LIE

Dear Pat McCrory:

SERIOUSLY???  THIS is the level our Public School Administrations have stopped to???

This is yet another reason why ALL anti-gun nuts should be ousted from ANY public office, and why anti-liberty legislation like "zero-tolerance" and "mandatory minimums" should be eliminated immediately!!!

While Cole Withrow strives to continue his HS graduation plans, he and all his friends are now getting an education in the anti-liberty evils of authoritarian collectivism that has permeated the STATE.  Rather than commending the boy for doing the RIGHT thing, he is punished for it, thereby teaching the entire student body to LIE.

EVERY such incident needs to be handled on an individual basis, with NO "zero-tolerance" and NO "mandatory minimums" being a factor in the judgement.  But that would require the usage of BRIANS, which apparently isn't common among many people in public offices.

Heck, if the school's principle had a brain he would have simply allowed the boy to take the shotgun home and return to school, or simply just leave it locked up in his automobile.  Or better yet, lock it up somewhere inaccessible to the students just in case a mass shooter decided that day to take advantage of our Federally mandated Helpless Victim Zones (aka: Gun Free Zones).

But of course, treating individuals individually AS individuals would also mandate those public officials who HAVE brains be freed from the collectivist brainwashing they've received their entire lives via the public school system and mass media.  Evil legislation like "zero-tolerance" and "mandatory minimums" exist BECAUSE authoritarian collectivist philosophy has become the norm in what I call "Neo-Amerika"… what America has become.

Thankfully, something good has come out of the evil actions of the school board: CHEERS to Liberty University for making a stand for liberty and rewarding this boy for acting honestly, justly and thoughtfully!

Liberty Univ. Offers Scholarship to Eagle Scout Facing Gun Charges


Now it's YOUR turn, Mr. Governor, to choose a side: tyranny or LIBERTY… which will it be?


bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

Petitions for Cole — PLEASE SHARE:





Tuesday, April 16, 2013

2013 Post-Tax Day Thoughts

The day after tax day 2013, I found this article on Facebook…

Corporate Tax Cheats on Tax Day: A Descent Into the Circles of Hell

… which takes various corporations on a decent into the various "circles of Dante's 'hell'" for cheating on their taxes.

However, in it there's not even a mention of the Federal Reserve & fractional banking system which has been ripping off American generations in perpetuity since 1913.

Then again, that's a matter of the STATE ripping off the People, so perhaps this issue doesn't fit the "anti-corporate" agenda of the writer (who perhaps also forgets that the State CREATED corporations and lies in bed with them)?  One can only wonder.

One can also only wonder if it's really "cheating" to strive to reduce the theft of SOME of the phony money that the IRS and Banking Cartel has been swindling for about a century now.  Looking at it in a more personal situation, if thieves have robbed your home and you manage to retrieve some of what they took, is one "cheating" them?

Regardless, if one is going to ONLY gripe about how [greedy] corporations are "cheating the IRS", then one is ONLY addressing the tip of the iceberg of corruption.  The obvious answer to ending tax cheating is to END the FED, END the bloody IRS, and return to an HONEST monetary system and an INDIRECT tax system.

The article is followed up by various comments about the complexity of the IRC (Internal Revenue Code) and the pros/cons of switching to a flat tax.  For all who are pondering over tax systems, please consider that ALL "income" tax systems (direct tax systems) prohibit the freedom of privacy.  This is one fundamental reason why the American founders were very clear about there being no direct taxes in the drafting of the US Constitution.

Of course, all this was corrupted throughout the Civil War (the first time an "income" tax was imposed) and just afterwards when the crooked ruling class of bureaucrats crafted and implemented a so called "income" tax, which began ONLY as a capital gains tax — in order to "tax the rich" — along with the DIS-honest "money" system and Federal Reserve.  Then later around WW2, the "income" tax was extended to also include wages.

But then again, if one actually begins to READ the insane IRC, one will soon discover how deceptively written it is, AND how the "income" tax really only applies to government workers, residents of D.C. and a few other US territories outside of the States.  But don't bring up any such facts with the IRS, as they will merely threaten you with a $20k+ fine for "frivolous arguments".

Those who continue to rail against various corporations for "cheating" the IRS are either not looking deep enough into the matter to reveal the entire truth, or have some kind of personal agenda against so called "CORPORATE AMERICA".

Those whose eyes are open will certainly realize that ANY business will take advantage of loopholes wherever the STATE allows.  And wherever the STATE manipulates a market, that market is no longer FREE, and therefore can no longer be considered "Capitalism", but rather some bastardization thereof, often known as "Crony Capitalism" or my personal favorite, "CORPORATISM".

No tax system is perfect.  However, the "Fair Tax" is the best imperfect "income" tax replacement system I've seen which is currently on the table — so long as the "income" tax and IRS are terminated.  If the Federal Government actually acted within its Constitutional limits, we could entirely eliminate a Federal tax altogether and simply use tariffs, as was intended from the onset.  Still, without returning to an honest money system, it's all moot, and economic collapse is certain.

When contemplating a better tax system, let us first address the DISHONEST "money" system and return to an HONEST one, THEN strive to return to an INDIRECT tax system, which is in accordance with freedom for all — NO MORE VIOLATION OF PRIVACY!


bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

Friday, February 22, 2013

Seeking Integrity Within Government

Dear Cecil,

You send this letter to your neighbors here in Asheville requesting support of your re-election to Asheville City Council, who will stand up to the claimed "corporate interests" of those [evil] Republicans locally and statewide who are supposedly so against the common individual.

Funny, it wasn't a bunch of "Republicans" and so called "Conservatives" that crafted local Asheville and NC State ordinances in a way which entirely circumvents any kind of reasonable recourse to violations against basic property rights and the liberties of the individual to live peacefully within the confines of their homes without interference from BIG BROTHER — rather, it was entirely a bunch of "Democrats" and so called "Progressives" who have engaged in such actions of domestic terrorism!

This is the TRUTH — does anyone even deal in TRUTH anymore?

[references: War on Affordable Housing (http://alturl.com/tscyv); NC Rules Defying Common Sense Wage War on Affordable Housing (http://alturl.com/e8up6); War on Affordable Housing - Local Edge Progressive Talk Radio 880 (http://alturl.com/5mt6h)]

But I will give you another chance at redeeming yourself in spite of the evil actions of your apparent political ilk throughout the years:

Would you commit to having City Council overturn this local draconian prohibitions of green/communal living arrangements which Asheville has fostered for decades, until poor and/or corrupt City governance enacted the horrible "UDO" back in 1997?  This of course includes lifting the draconian prohibition over what this City has defined as "boarding houses" AND lifting the draconian proximity restriction over B&B's, while in the meantime putting a STOP to any and all actions against those being wrongly punished as a result.

You see, upon being victimized — still — by the City of Asheville, I've become somewhat of an "expert" on these matters.  The primary issue here is that the City is violating the rights of many individuals by performing what is legally termed as "takings" of property rights without compensation (thus violating the US Constitution's Fifth Amendment regarding "eminent domain") WHILE not considering instances on a case by case situation.

In doing so, the City has forced my property into foreclosure proceedings which I have been fighting now for two years!  While this City has entirely refused to consider the age-old legal precedent of "Right of Use" (and "Grandfathering"), I have made a major effort on my part to overlook these violations upon my property rights and general liberties in attempt to work WITH the City via the process of "conditional re-zoning".  In spite of following the "Urban Planning" department's recommendations and wasting thousands of MY dollars doing so, the very same department at the last minute withdrew their recommendations and offered no reasonable recourse to my dilemma whatsoever.

Now I am forced to continue in my attempt to work out some kind of arrangement with the mortgage holder of my property, as this City has made it clear to me that it is not interested in the least in coming to a reasonable arrangement which would allow me to continue living peacefully in my home of 22 years, which I have fully restored and thus provided to this community as affordable green communal living — something the City of Asheville has hypocritically given lip service to for decades now.

IF the City Council has the power and authority to pass such draconian anti-liberty, anti-people, and anti-community ordinances, then it ALSO has the power and authority to provide recourse to individuals these ordinances have directly damaged, both financially and physiologically.

So what say you, as a self-proclaimed "progressive libertarian" who I have now petitioned for redress of these local grievances committed against myself and others?  Are you willing to take a stand against such violations against your neighbor's individual rights and livelihood, pursuant to happiness?  Do you (or anyone else within our local or state government) have such integrity?  Or will you continue in joining the throng of bureaucratic hypocrites who merely give lip service to such concepts as affordable green living and individual liberty itself?

I await your answer...


bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

On Feb 20, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Cecil Bothwell wrote:

Reelect Bothwell 2013
Friend —
Now, more than ever, North Carolina needs strong progressive leaders that will stand up to the Republican Party and the corporate interests that want to dominate this state. I’ve consistently led the charge against radical conservatives, and I don’t intend to back down now!
I’m running for a second term on the Asheville City Council. Will you join me?
My goal in serving our community during my first term was to faithfully represent you, the citizens of this city.
I’ve done that these past four years, and I’m willing to devote another four years to fighting the good fight. But not everyone wants to re-elect a committed progressive in Asheville.
In fact, State Rep. Tim Moffitt has publicly singled me out for defeat. Considering his close ties to big money and Art Pope, our campaign could face a well-funded, ultra-conservative opponent.
You are receiving this message because you’ve stood with me before . . . or because someone told me that you stand up for progressive causes. Can I count on your support in my reelection campaign?
I have consistently been a leading voice for a greener Asheville. From single-stream recycling (the big blue curbside bins) to building and light efficiency, the environment has always been a top priority for me. What’s more, these measures have cut waste, saved money and reduced the city’s carbon footprint.
Perhaps most significantly, I have been your voice on our City Council, sometimes casting the only pro or con vote on important issues, when other members have seemed deaf to popular will. When reelected, I will continue to take a stand on your behalf and for the rights of every citizen in Asheville.
Thank you for taking a moment to read this message. I hope you’ll take this opportunity to get involved with our powerful grassroots campaign.
Thank you,
Cecil Bothwell
Reelect Bothwell 2013 · United States
This email was sent to infinitybbc@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.
You can also keep up with Bothwell for Council 2013 on Twitter or Facebook.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013


NC Legislature:

I am OUTRAGED that this is even being considered!  In the wake of economic calamity, lack of jobs and soaring unemployment, Federal spending like there's no tomorrow, and our elected NC legislators are considering giving a multi-millionaire in Charlotte $62 million of OUR PHONY MONEY for something he can afford to do for himself?


This is a perfect example of Corporate Welfare, something that supposedly "both political sides" are against, right?  Or perhaps this is another perfect example to us NC residents how corrupt our state bureaucrats really are!

Please tell us, who among you believe THEFT of public funds is LEGAL?  Who among you is getting kickbacks from this proposition?  Who among you should we NOT elect during the next voting cycle?  We presume EVERYONE of you corrupt representatives who actually VOTE for this CORPORATE WELFARE is a THIEF and we WILL vote you OUT next cycle — you can count on it!

Not only will giving this millionaire do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING for NC residents who are financially struggling to survive, but it's yet another example of how gov't at ALL levels has FAILED to fulfill its proper role — to protect the RIGHTS of individuals and UPHOLD the US Constitution.

If the NC Legislature goes through with this, We the People of NC will have no other recourse than to organize an all out NC State TAX STRIKE (based upon the First Amendment Accountability Clause (https://sites.google.com/site/infinitylibertyworks/home), for violation of the US Constitution as well as your oaths of office as our NC representatives.

We the People will accomplish this through various grassroots individuals within organizations across the deceptive political spectrum who ALL agree that CORPORATE WELFARE is wrong.  We will petition the State of NC for a redress of this grievance and we will prevail!

Consider yourselves notified.  Examine your motives and your actions.  Remember your OATHS of OFFICE.  We the People are watching YOU!


bernard baruch carman
* * *
- truth seeker/seeder • SeedsOfTruth.org • ∞Liberty
infinityGAMES ∞ audio/Mac specialist
∞ ∞ ∞

Begin forwarded message:

From: "North Carolina Campaign for Liberty" <north.carolina@campaignforliberty.com>
Subject: It's a Shakedown
Date: February 18, 2013 12:22:24 PM EST

Dear bernard b,

First it was bailouts for Wall Street.  Taxpayer cash for Fannie, Freddie, and AIG.

Then bailouts for "automakers" (which was really code for Obama's Union cronies.)

Then the failed "stimulus."

Then a complete cave-in on the fiscal cliff, with taxes going up for everyone with no spending cuts.

But that's not enough.  When it comes to government picking your pockets for the benefit of billionaires, it's never enough.

Now Jerry Richardson and the Carolina Panthers want whatever you've got left, and they're going to use state government to get it!

Bank of America Stadium was built in 1996.  It's less than 20 years old, and Jerry Richardson and the Panthers own it, lock, stock and barrel.  But if Jerry has his way, the NC General Assembly will give him $62.5 million to renovate his stadium.

Not loan.  GIVE.

You see, Jerry has a long wish list.  He wants $28 million in new escalators. $59 million in new video and ribbon boards, along with a new sound system.  $62 million for new seats, and $25 million in "technology upgrades."

And he wants you to pay for it.  Why?  Well, as he puts it, “They’re so coveted (NFL franchises). They (owners) don’t have to pay for them. There are only 32. That’s the reality.”

Right now you might be thinking, "Wait, that's more than the $62.5 million he's asking from the state."

That's right, it is.  That's why Jerry Richardson and the Panthers also want the City of Charlotte to jack up their taxes.  He's pressuring the NC General Assembly to pass a bill giving the Democrat-controlled Charlotte City Council (which thinks this is all a terrific idea, by the way) permission to increase Charlotte's prepared food and beverage tax--so the city can give Jerry another $144 million.

In his Tea Party response to the State of the Union address, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul said, "What America needs is not Robin Hood, but Adam Smith."

I agree, but this isn't even robbing the rich to give to the poor.  Jerry Richardson (whose net worth is somewhere around $500 million) wants to rob from everyone to spend on himself.

This has to be stopped.  Corporate welfare is the worst kind of welfare.  The Charlotte City Council has already eagerly agreed to this massive highway robbery, but they still need the state's permission to jack their food taxes through the roof.  Unfortunately, Republican leaders in Raleigh are trying to duck the issue.

When asked about this giveaway, Rep. Bill Brawley (bill.brawley@ncleg.net) said, "There will be a referendum."

Translation: I don't want to make a decision, so I'll punt it to voters.

Speaker Thom Tillis said that while he's opposed to direct state money going to the Panthers, he's willing to consider letting Charlotte Democrats raise taxes to force Charlotte citizens to foot the bill.

None of this is acceptable.  What's needed is for state leaders in Raleigh to stand up to this shakedown attempt and refuse to give state money to the Panthers, and also refuse permission for Charlotte Democrats to rob Charlotte taxpayers.

Right now, today, look up your NC Senator and NC House Representative's contact information here and send this message:

Dear Sir (or Madam,)

I have just heard that you are considering giving taxpayer money to Jerry Richardson and the Carolina Panthers to renovate their privately-owned stadium.  This is an outrageous request to pick the pockets of North Carolinians for the benefit of a private organization.

No economic benefits outweigh the importance of protecting the public trust.  Theft is theft, even under color of authority.  It is simply not the role of government to fund professional sports.

I insist that you vote against any funding request to give the Carolina Panthers state money, and I further demand that you vote against any bill giving the City of Charlotte permission to increase their prepared food and beverage tax to benefit the Panthers, or any other professional sports team.

I will be watching this story via updates from North Carolina's Campaign for Liberty.

(Your Name)
North Carolina Taxpayer

Please also take a moment to sign Campaign for Liberty's "NO BAILOUTS FOR SPORTS MILLIONAIRES" petition.  Your signature will send a loud and clear signal to Raleigh that you won't tolerate having your pockets picked to turn football into another government-subsidized boondoggle.

Finally, please call House Speaker Thom Tillis and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger.  Tell them to vote NO on state money for the Panthers and NO to jacking up Charlotte taxes for the Panthers!

Speaker Thom Tillis:

Senator Phil Berger:
(919) 733-5708

NC's Campaign for Liberty will keep you informed on how this fight to keep crony capitalists out of your wallet progresses.

In Liberty,

Adam Love
NC State Coordinator
Campaign for Liberty

P.S. Jerry Richardson and the Carolina Panthers are petitioning the NC General Assembly for taxpayer money to upgrade their privately-owned stadium.  Please sign Campaign for Liberty's petition to keep crony capitalists from picking your pocket!  Also be sure to contact your state senator and representative and tell them to oppose bailouts for sports millionaires!